<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire the Speechwriters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podiumpundits.com/2009/09/08/fire-the-speechwriters-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podiumpundits.com/2009/09/08/fire-the-speechwriters-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:47:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidmurray</title>
		<link>http://www.podiumpundits.com/2009/09/08/fire-the-speechwriters-2/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>davidmurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiumpundits.com/?p=2263#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Latimer&#039;s column struck me as at once disingenuous, opportunistic and harmless. Hard to believe he believed what he was saying. Easy to believe he prepared the piece cynically, calculated to make an editor bite: &quot;hey, speechwriter calls for firing all the speechwriters.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It reminded me of another sound-and-fury-signifying-nothing op/ed 16 years ago in the Wall Street Journal. &quot;Speechwriters of the world, get lost!&quot; wrote speechwriter Phil Theibert.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such pieces get written because speechwriters know the formula for publicity—and because their professional experience has made them utterly comfortable in the knowledge that op/eds don&#039;t move mountains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or even molehills, as the case may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latimer&#39;s column struck me as at once disingenuous, opportunistic and harmless. Hard to believe he believed what he was saying. Easy to believe he prepared the piece cynically, calculated to make an editor bite: &#8220;hey, speechwriter calls for firing all the speechwriters.&#8221; </p>
<p>It reminded me of another sound-and-fury-signifying-nothing op/ed 16 years ago in the Wall Street Journal. &#8220;Speechwriters of the world, get lost!&#8221; wrote speechwriter Phil Theibert.</p>
<p>Such pieces get written because speechwriters know the formula for publicity—and because their professional experience has made them utterly comfortable in the knowledge that op/eds don&#39;t move mountains.</p>
<p>Or even molehills, as the case may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defending Presidential Speeches &#124; Podium Pundits</title>
		<link>http://www.podiumpundits.com/2009/09/08/fire-the-speechwriters-2/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Defending Presidential Speeches &#124; Podium Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiumpundits.com/?p=2263#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] HomeContributeComment PolicyAbout UsContact Us    &#171; Fire the Speechwriters? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HomeContributeComment PolicyAbout UsContact Us    &laquo; Fire the Speechwriters? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

