<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ailes v Huffington: No Match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podiumpundits.com/2010/01/31/ailes-v-huffington-no-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podiumpundits.com/2010/01/31/ailes-v-huffington-no-match/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:47:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.podiumpundits.com/2010/01/31/ailes-v-huffington-no-match/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>David Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podiumpundits.com/?p=2726#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Hey, Clark—&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Appreciate your perspective, but blogging mores—and Vital Speeches&#039; 75-year-old tradition of printing the unfiltered text—I suggest you ought to include a link to that which you skewer, so that your readers may judge for themselves. After reading this full analysis of the Huffington-Ailes encounter, with full clips of the encounter itself, your readers will no doubt criticize you only for not smothering Walters and Huffington thoroughly enough!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/roger-ailes-on-this-week_n_443555.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/roger-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David Murray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Clark—</p>
<p>Appreciate your perspective, but blogging mores—and Vital Speeches&#39; 75-year-old tradition of printing the unfiltered text—I suggest you ought to include a link to that which you skewer, so that your readers may judge for themselves. After reading this full analysis of the Huffington-Ailes encounter, with full clips of the encounter itself, your readers will no doubt criticize you only for not smothering Walters and Huffington thoroughly enough!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/roger-ailes-on-this-week_n_443555.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/roger-.." rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/roger-..</a>.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>David Murray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

